
A nickel alloy cross-reference table maps one alloy across the numbering systems that different buyers, mills and airframe primes use. The same material can be ordered as UNS N06625 in an American mill certificate, 2.4856 in a German enquiry, GH3625 on a Chinese drawing and AMS 5666 on an aerospace purchase order — four strings of characters that describe one metal. The table below puts those systems side by side, and the sections after it explain where cross-referencing is safe and where it quietly causes failures.
What does each numbering system actually control?
Most cross-reference tables list numbers without saying what each number governs. That is the root of most substitution errors, because the six systems do not cover the same ground.
| System | Issued by | What the number identifies | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| UNS | ASTM / SAE | Chemical composition identity, nothing else | N06625 |
| Werkstoff | DIN / CEN | European material number in the DIN tradition | 2.4856 |
| GB / GH / NS | SAC (SAMR) | Chinese national grade designation | GH3625 |
| JIS | JSA | Japanese industrial standard grade | NCF 625 |
| AMS | SAE | Aerospace material specification: composition plus process plus properties | AMS 5666 |
| ASTM B / A | ASTM | Product-form specification: tube, plate, bar, fitting | ASTM B444 |
The distinction matters most for AMS. UNS N06625 tells a mill what to melt. AMS 5666 tells an aerospace supplier how to melt it, how to forge it, what grain size to reach, which mechanical tests to run and how to certify the result. Two bars with identical chemistry can satisfy UNS and fail AMS.
Nickel alloy cross-reference table
Blank cells mean the alloy has no grade in that system, not that the grade is unknown. A tilde (≈) marks a pair that is compositionally close but produced under separate specifications — treat them as equivalents for engineering discussion, not as automatically interchangeable for procurement.
| UNS | Trade name | Werkstoff | GB / GH | JIS | AMS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N02200 | Nickel 200 | 2.4066 | N6 ≈ | NW 2200 | — |
| N02201 | Nickel 201 | 2.4068 | N4 ≈ | NW 2201 | — |
| N04400 | Monel 400 | 2.4360 | — | NW 4400 | — |
| N05500 | Monel K-500 | 2.4375 | — | NW 5500 | — |
| N06600 | Inconel 600 | 2.4816 | GH3600 ≈ | NCF 600 | AMS 5665 |
| N06601 | Inconel 601 | 2.4851 | — | NCF 601 | — |
| N06617 | Inconel 617 | 2.4663 | — | — | — |
| N06625 | Inconel 625 | 2.4856 | GH3625 ≈ | NCF 625 | AMS 5599 / 5666 |
| N06690 | Inconel 690 | 2.4642 | — | — | — |
| N07718 | Inconel 718 | 2.4668 | GH4169 ≈ | NCF 718 | AMS 5662 / 5663 / 5664 |
| N07725 | Inconel 725 | — | — | — | — |
| N07750 | Inconel X-750 | 2.4669 | GH4145 ≈ | NCF 750 | — |
| N07041 | René 41 | 2.4973 | GH4141 ≈ | — | — |
| N07080 | Nimonic 80A | 2.4952 | GH4033 ≈ | NCF 80A | — |
| N07090 | Nimonic 90 | 2.4632 | GH4090 ≈ | NCF 90 | — |
| N06075 | Nimonic 75 | 2.4951 | GH3030 ≈ | — | AMS 5540 |
| N08800 | Incoloy 800 | 1.4876 | — | NCF 800 | — |
| N08810 | Incoloy 800H | 1.4958 | — | NCF 800H | — |
| N08811 | Incoloy 800HT | 1.4959 | — | — | — |
| N08825 | Incoloy 825 | 2.4858 | — | NCF 825 | — |
| N09925 | Incoloy 925 | — | — | — | — |
| S66286 | A-286 | 1.4980 | GH2132 ≈ | SUH 660 | AMS 5731 |
| N10276 | Hastelloy C-276 | 2.4819 | NS3304 ≈ | — | — |
| N06022 | Hastelloy C-22 | 2.4602 | — | — | — |
| N06200 | Hastelloy C-2000 | 2.4675 | — | — | — |
| N10665 | Hastelloy B-2 | 2.4617 | — | — | — |
| N10675 | Hastelloy B-3 | 2.4600 | — | — | — |
| N06002 | Hastelloy X | 2.4665 | GH3536 ≈ | — | — |
| K93600 | Invar 36 | 1.3912 | 4J36 | — | — |
Two rows deserve attention because they break the pattern people expect. A-286 (UNS S66286) is an iron-base alloy and it is the only grade in this table that JIS files outside the NCF family — SUH 660 lives in the heat-resisting steel series. And Hastelloy C-276 carries a Chinese corrosion-resistant grade (NS3304) while carrying no JIS grade at all, which is why Japanese enquiries for it usually arrive quoting ASTM ASTM B575 or ASTM B619 directly.
Titanium cross-reference table
Titanium follows its own logic. The American system uses Grade numbers, the Chinese system uses alloy designations (TA for commercially pure, TC for alpha-beta alloys), and JIS H 4600 uses Class numbers. Werkstoff numbers for titanium are widely quoted in European enquiries.
| UNS | Grade | Werkstoff | Chinese grade | JIS | AMS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R50250 | Ti Grade 1 | 3.7025 | TA1 | Class 1 | — |
| R50400 | Ti Grade 2 | 3.7035 | TA2 | Class 2 | AMS 4902 |
| R50550 | Ti Grade 3 | 3.7055 | TA3 | Class 3 | — |
| R50700 | Ti Grade 4 | 3.7065 | TA4 | Class 4 | — |
| R52400 | Ti Grade 7 | 3.7235 | TA9 | Class 12 | — |
| R53400 | Ti Grade 12 | 3.7105 | TA10 | Class 11 | — |
| R56400 | Ti Grade 5 | 3.7165 | TC4 | Class 60 | AMS 4928 |
| R56407 | Ti Grade 23 | 3.7165 | TC4 ELI | Class 60E | — |
Grades 1 through 4 are unalloyed titanium separated by oxygen content — and oxygen content is what sets strength. Increasing oxygen from 0.18% to 0.25% moves the same metal from Grade 1 to Grade 2 and raises minimum yield from 170 MPa to 275 MPa. This is why a Grade 1 to Grade 2 substitution is almost always acceptable upward and never downward without a re-check.
How do Chinese grades map back to UNS numbers?
Chinese drawings typically quote the GB grade, so the reverse lookup is the one that gets used most often in day-to-day enquiry work. GH grades come from GB/T 14992, which covers wrought superalloys; NS grades come from GB/T 15007, which covers corrosion-resistant alloys. The two series were written for different service environments and cannot be merged into one list.
| Chinese grade | UNS | International trade name | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| GH3030 | N06075 | Nimonic 75 ≈ | Ni-Cr solid-solution |
| GH2132 | S66286 | A-286 ≈ | Fe-Ni-Cr, age-hardenable |
| GH3536 | N06002 | Hastelloy X ≈ | Ni-Cr-Fe-Mo |
| GH3600 | N06600 | Inconel 600 ≈ | Ni-Cr |
| GH3625 | N06625 | Inconel 625 ≈ | Ni-Cr-Mo-Nb |
| GH4033 | N07080 | Nimonic 80A ≈ | Ni-Cr-Ti-Al |
| GH4090 | N07090 | Nimonic 90 ≈ | Ni-Cr-Co-Ti-Al |
| GH4141 | N07041 | René 41 ≈ | Ni-Cr-Co-Mo |
| GH4145 | N07750 | Inconel X-750 ≈ | Ni-Cr-Fe-Ti-Al |
| GH4169 | N07718 | Inconel 718 ≈ | Ni-Fe-Cr-Nb |
| NS3304 | N10276 | Hastelloy C-276 ≈ | Ni-Mo-Cr-W |
| N4 | N02201 | Nickel 201 ≈ | Commercially pure nickel |
| N6 | N02200 | Nickel 200 ≈ | Commercially pure nickel |
| 4J36 | K93600 | Invar 36 | Fe-36Ni |
| TA2 | R50400 | Ti Grade 2 | Commercially pure titanium |
| TA9 | R52400 | Ti Grade 7 | Ti-0.2Pd |
| TA10 | R53400 | Ti Grade 12 | Ti-0.3Mo-0.8Ni |
| TC4 | R56400 | Ti Grade 5 | Ti-6Al-4V |
| TC4 ELI | R56407 | Ti Grade 23 | Ti-6Al-4V extra-low interstitial |
The GH designation is a grade family, not a single specification. GH4169 sets a composition window; it does not set the heat treatment cycle, the grain size or the acceptance tests. Those live in the product standard — GB/T 14994 for cold drawn bar, or the applicable ASTM or AMS specification when the drawing calls for one. Read GH4090 cold drawn bar as an example of how a single GB grade fans out across product forms.
Why does one alloy carry six different numbers?
Each numbering system grew out of a different problem, and none of them was designed to be read alongside the others.
UNS was created in the 1970s when North American industry could no longer keep track of trade names — "Hastelloy", "Inconel" and "Nimonic" are trademarks owned by specific companies, and a mill cannot put a competitor's trademark on a certificate. The UNS number is deliberately trademark-free so that anyone can claim compliance with it.
Werkstoff numbers encode the same information in a numeric tradition that predates computer databases. The five-digit number is an index, not a description; 2.4856 carries no more meaning than N06625 does.
The GH series was built for the Chinese aeroengine and gas turbine programmes, and it borrowed composition ranges from the British Nimonic and American Inconel families while writing its own grade names. This is why GH4033 and Nimonic 80A sit almost on top of each other.
AMS exists because aerospace buyers needed more than composition. A single AMS specification can lock down melting practice, forging temperature, grain size, tensile properties at elevated temperature, stress rupture life and the exact certification paperwork.
When is a cross-reference safe to use for substitution?
A cross-reference table is a translation aid, not an approval. Before any grade in it is substituted for another on a live job, three conditions must hold at the same time.
| Check | What must match | Typical failure when it does not |
|---|---|---|
| Composition limits | Every element of the substitute must fall inside the original specification's window | Nickel 200 and Nickel 201 differ only in carbon (0.15% vs 0.02%) — but 201 exists specifically for service above 315 °C |
| Delivery condition | Annealed, solution treated, aged or cold worked must match | Solution-treated Inconel 718 yields about 480 MPa; the same bar aged yields about 1,100 MPa |
| Product form and specification | The product standard must match, not just the grade | ASTM B444 tube and ASTM B575 plate set different mechanical requirements for the same UNS number |
The third row is the one that catches experienced buyers. Composition equivalence says nothing about which product standard applies, and different product standards set different minimum properties for identical chemistry. A tube to ASTM B444 and a plate to ASTM B575 can both be N10276 and still carry different specified minimum yield strengths.
Where a substitution is being considered for a pressure boundary, the three checks above are the minimum. Weldability, thermal expansion matching and corrosion performance in the specific medium sit on top of them, and none of those can be read off a cross-reference table.
Where do cross-reference tables go wrong?
The mistakes are consistent enough to list.
| Assumption | Reality |
|---|---|
| Identical UNS number means fully interchangeable parts | UNS fixes composition only — delivery condition and product form are still open |
| GH4169 and AMS 5662 are the same document | One is a Chinese grade designation, the other an American aerospace specification with testing and traceability requirements |
| A-286 is a stainless steel | It is iron-base and corrosion resistant, but it is precipitation hardened and JIS files it under SUH, not the stainless steel series |
| NCF 625 is the Japanese version of GH3625 | They are parallel national grades, not a translation of each other; each carries its own testing regime |
| Werkstoff 1.4980 and UNS S66286 are identical | The composition windows overlap but are not written identically, and minor differences trigger rejections at goods-in inspection |
A further category of error comes from tables that are simply wrong. Grade equivalences circulated on the web are frequently copied from one another without verification, and a single mistyped digit propagates across hundreds of documents. Any equivalence that matters commercially should be confirmed against the current edition of the specification, not against a table.
How should a purchase order be written?
A purchase order should carry the specification, the grade and the delivery condition — three fields, never fewer.
For a European enquiry for corrosion-resistant tubing, that is: ASTM B622, UNS N06022 (Werkstoff 2.4602), solution annealed and pickled. For an aerospace forging it may be: AMS 5663, UNS N07718, solution treated and aged to a specified hardness range. For a Chinese project it may be: GB/T 14994, GH4090, cold drawn and solution treated.
When a customer supplies only one of the three, the supplier has to assume the rest, and the assumption is where disputes begin. Two useful habits follow from this. Ask for the product standard whenever a drawing quotes only a grade — it settles the mechanical property question immediately. And quote the delivery condition explicitly even when the standard defines a default, because defaults differ between systems.
The site's piping grade matching guide applies the same three-field discipline to pipe, fittings, flanges and filler metal, which is where most cross-system confusion on a project actually surfaces.
Continue reading
- How to Specify Nickel Alloy Plate and Sheet: Standard, Condition and FinishA nickel alloy plate order is not complete until it names the product standard, the rolling condition, the thi
- How to Specify Nickel Alloy Round Bars on a Purchase OrderWhat a complete Inconel, Hastelloy or Monel round bar order must state — grade, UNS, product standard, conditi
- Inconel 718 Round Bar (φ2–600 mm): Composition, Mechanical Properties & SupplierInconel 718 round bar (N07718) supplier: composition, aged properties, sizes and tolerances. Factory price fro
- Inconel 625 Round Bar (φ2–600 mm): Composition, Mechanical Properties & SupplierInconel 625 round bar (N06625) supplier: composition, aged properties, sizes and tolerances. Factory price fro
- Hastelloy C-276 Plate & Sheet: Composition, Mechanical Properties & SupplierHastelloy C-276 plate (N10276) supplier: composition, aged properties, sizes and tolerances. Factory price fro
- All 14 Product Forms & Specifications guides
Frequently asked questions
What does UNS mean in a nickel alloy grade?
UNS is the Unified Numbering System, a five-character identity code beginning with a letter that indicates the family, followed by four digits, such as N06625 for Inconel 625 — it fixes the chemical composition range and nothing else, leaving heat treatment, mechanical properties and product form to be set by a separate product or material specification.
Is GH4169 the same as Inconel 718?
GH4169 and Inconel 718 describe the same alloy family, a niobium-bearing nickel-iron-chromium superalloy, but they are separate specifications rather than synonyms — GB/T 14992 sets the GH4169 composition and grade designation, while AMS 5662 adds aerospace melting practice, testing and traceability, so safety-critical parts should be ordered against both.
Can Hastelloy C-22 be substituted for C-276 without requalifying?
In most oxidizing and mixed-acid service C-22 performs at least as well as C-276 and is often selected for exactly that reason, but substitution without requalification is not automatic — C-276 remains the stronger choice in strongly reducing hydrochloric acid, and any change to a pressure-boundary material requires the composition, delivery condition and product form checks to be repeated against the governing specification.
Why is A-286 listed under SUH 660 in JIS rather than in the NCF series?
Because JIS sorts grades by base chemistry rather than by application — the NCF series in JIS G 4901 through G 4904 covers nickel-base heat and corrosion resistant superalloys, while SUH 660 in JIS G 4312 covers heat-resisting steels, and A-286 is iron-base with roughly 25 percent nickel, so it belongs to the steel family despite being used alongside superalloys.